Food is medicine, except when it isn't funded

From the blog · Adam Stetzer

The gap between what Washington says about food-as-medicine and what it's actually funding just got harder to ignore. This week we looked at the SNAP-Ed defunding, a Rhode Island law that moves in the opposite direction, the avoidable-cost argument clinicians are taking to state officials, and the quiet contradiction at the heart of the MAHA agenda.

SNAP-Ed Is Being Defunded: What the H.R. 1 Nutrition Education Cut Means for Food Is Medicine Programs

H.R. 1 eliminates SNAP-Ed — the federally funded nutrition education program that operated in the same low-income communities Food Is Medicine programs serve — removing infrastructure, not just a budget line.

Rhode Island Signs Food as Medicine Pilot Program Into Law — What the New Task Force and 1115 Waiver Authority Mean

Rhode Island's HB 8171, signed June 18, 2026, bundles three elements rarely seen together in a single FIM law: a dedicated EOHHS task force, an active pilot program mandate, and explicit Section 1115 Medicaid waiver authority.

When 358 Clinicians Write to the Governor About SNAP: The Avoidable-Cost Framework FIM State Officers Need Now

358 Massachusetts clinicians put a $237 billion annual figure on the avoidable healthcare costs of food insecurity — framing SNAP as a prescription that prevents far more expensive care downstream.

The MAHA Health Agenda Promises What SNAP Delivers — So Why Are 5 Million People Losing It?

H.R. 1 has cut SNAP access for more than 5 million people — shrinking the eligible population for every FIM produce prescription and medically tailored meal program in the country.

You're receiving this because you subscribed at nutritious.fit. We'll never spam you.
Read this issue online

https://nutritious.fit

Unsubscribe